Andrew,
You did a great job preaching a couple of weeks ago. I think your sermon was well-crafted and
well-delivered. You were convincing and
authentic and effective and engaging.
You seem relaxed and confident in your message to us.
I hated it.
Forgive my obliqueness. I ‘enjoyed’ it – for whatever that
really means. But the sermon, combined
with Beth’s sermon the week before on Amos’ call for justice, placed me, as
would have been said in earlier years, ‘under conviction.’ It doesn’t feel good
to be under conviction. It makes me feel itchy and squirmy and uneasy –
spiritually sweaty.
The upshot is this: To get serious about following Jesus I
am called to look at the presence or absence of justice in my outlook and in my
life. I have been doing this and I am
coming up short.
The first challenge in moving toward a just life is coming
to grips with prejudice, and prejudice is about perception. How clearly do I see? How accurate is my
discernment? Do I see others as they truly are, or are my perception shaped by
decisions I have already made about who and what they are?
I guess I didn’t hate your sermon as much as I hate the
answers to these questions.
I have such a long way to go, and, clearly, we all do, some
more than others. My prejudice seems to have ‘levels’ to it.
The first level is a conscious rejection of the politics of hate.
For most of us this is not a huge feat. To affirm that ‘all men [sic] are
created equal and endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights…’ is
an affirmation most of us can and do make without much pain. So we support
equal pay for equal work legislation and quit using words like nigger, kike,
slope, and cracker to describe those whose ethnicity differs from ours. We
encourage our daughters to be firefighters, cops, and truckers, if that’s what
they want, and our sons to cook, clean, paint and sew. We vote African-American
political candidates into office and even celebrate their success. We hire the
handicapped. We join the majority and
come around eventually to supporting gay marriage.
Then there is the next level – the level to which we are
brought, for example, by the Zimmerman trial. This level is usually hidden from
our conscious notice, which makes us much more likely to deny its presence. It
is visceral and deeply embedded in the places that fundamentally effect our
perceptions, particularly our perceptions when under threat or stress. It, I
think, is primitive and tribal. The guy who would never use the n-word in
conversation walks sheepishly to the other side of the street when he seems the
Trayvon-hoodie-wearing-kid coming the other way. We lock our car doors when driving across the
tracks. We scream ethnically-charged epithets in traffic that, when they spring
out of our mouths, surprise and embarrass us even when there is no one around
to hear them. Our churches are the most segregated places in the culture -
still. We make snap judgments about folks when we see their clothes, their
cars, and their dental work. Our ‘enlightenment’ does seem to have much effect
on the social strata that shape our daily lives. We have no objection to
interracial marriage but are quite relieved our child is not in one. Try as we
may we can’t seem to fully accept the mixed ethnicity of our president and so
subject him to absurd judgments. We claim that some of our best friends are
gay.
I can’t make out who others are because of the filters
through which I see them even though I ‘know better’ – filters that are known
by another name: Prejudice. Premature judgments. I know who you are before I
know who you are.
And now my preachers are telling me that my walk with Jesus
demands that I face this and deal with it? Is this perhaps where justice
begins? Is this lingering, visceral, second-level prejudice ungodly?
I will have to pray about this. Keep up the good work.